Coming to Oklahoma
My wife and
I moved to OKC from the state of Oregon in the late summer of 2012. We knew
about the move long before then, in the fall of 2011 when I was offered the
position that would be waiting for me here upon my graduation. So I had a lot
of time to tell people about moving to Oklahoma. A lot of time to field bemused
questions. A lot of time to defend our decision to move here.
And what I generally said was this:
that OKC was a dynamic place, with a ton of energy and a lot of momentum. That
they had the Thunder and were (gasp) building a streetcar! That there were in
fact cool young people there and they were not all Sally Kern. As an aside,
most Oregonians have not actually heard of Sally Kern, but yet on a deeper
level they have, and whenever the word “Oklahoma” comes up in conversation
Sally’s abhorrent politics drift across their minds like a wraith. That summer
the Thunder made the finals and that helped my cause somewhat (for propaganda
piece on this see here). But still, folks were skeptical.
After I
moved here I fielded more questions from back in Oregon. “How are you liking
it?” said with the intonation that they were, prior to hearing my answer,
preemptively cringing in an anxious, at times hopeful way, knowing that
whatever it was I was going to say would either confirm their stereotypes about
Oklahoma or else be a bald-faced lie. Still I told them that I mostly liked it.
The weather sucks but then again it does everywhere north of Santa Barbara.
Other than that things were cool. Marilee and I found a (cheap by Oregon
standards) rental in a charming old house within walking distance of one of the
awesomest record stores around (Guest Room). We could walk to restaurants along
Western. I could bike to work (if properly motivated). I worked in a kick-ass
skyscraper downtown with a whole legion of 20-something professionals. My
brother flew out to see Jeff Mangum at the Diamond Ballroom with me and, after
meeting my friends, he confessed, “If you had told me you’d go work for an oil
company in Oklahoma and end up working with a bunch of Indie Rockers I would
never have believed you!”
And people
were friendly. So friendly it was almost unbelievable! Night and day different
in the level of friendliness between here and anywhere else I’ve ever lived.
Much friendlier as a species than Oregon. Much much friendlier than Houston. There
was an unusual sort of gung-ho attitude about everyone also. A “we’re all in
this together” vibe that is really infectious.
I like
Oklahoma City. I like its energy. I like the direction it seems to be moving. I
understand that it was not always this way.
Let me now tell you, up front, what sucks about Mick Cornett
He
won’t debate Ed Shadid. This is a low-class move. Similar was that time in 2011
when he went ahead with the MAPS 3 timeline vote in spite of delayskeeping two
council members away from the scene. Also not classy. Why this was done is uncertain, as a delay in
the vote would not have affected the outcome of the vote either way.
I’ve never
met Mick Cornett, but he seems arrogant and cocky, and if in real life he’s a
complete asshole I wouldn’t especially be surprised. There is no secret that
Mick Cornett didn’t want to run for another term as mayor but that the prospect
of Shadid winning and the lack of another mainstream candidate scared him and
the local power brokers enough that he threw his hat in for 2014. He seems a
little lazy with his campaigning. I’ve already had two opportunities to meet
and talk with Ed Shadid. Zero, thus far for Cornett. There was a large event I
was invited to, but I had a conflict, and in any regard it will not be the
intimate occasion that Ed Shadid has found time for.
In 2006,
Mick Cornett apparently thought that these three issues were the biggest
problems facing America. His record on LGBT issues is not great (although
he is no Michelle Bachmann). In 2011 he did vote in favor of (Ed Shadid’s)
motion to explicitly ban discrimination based on sexual orientation in city
offices. So there is that. Also this last fall when certain local churches
attempted to manufacture a scandal over a production on city property of “The
Most Fabulous Story Ever Told,” a gay reimagining of the birth of Jesus, Mick
politely kept silent. So at least we know the gay-baiting phase of his career
is behind him.
Then there
is the matter of the embarrassing implementation of MAPS 3/Project 180. I don’t
know where to begin. There was the time that someone involved with the budgeting of MAPS3 simply did the math wrong, and just like that the city would only afford to build 35 of the promised 70 miles of sidewalks (additional money from the general fund were eventually allocated to build all the promised sidewalk ).This was embarrassing. So too was the half-assed implementation of Project 180, with
streets torn up for months at a time with no visible progress. The fact that
project 180 tore up and rebuilt streets which will, in the course of the next
18 months, be torn up and rebuilt again for the streetcar line. Imagine the
savings if the work had been consolidated.
None of these execution issues were themselves
Mick’s personal fault, but there has been no move to hold anyone accountable
either. A depressing, self-defeating, “well, live and learn” vibe out of Mick
on this stuff.
About Ed
About Ed
Shadid. I know he inspired a passionate following when he ran for Ward 2 city
councilor. I know he is inspiring a passionate following in his mayor’s race.
Moreover he seems like a nice, thoughtful guy. As a city councilor I am impressed
with Shadid on several points: (1) he was quick to jump on the bandwagon
started by the Friends for a Better Boulevard in rethinking/redesigning the
Crosstown Expressway to make it more pedestrian, bike and business freindly,
(2) Shadid almost singlehandedly spearheaded the movement to change what was
going to be a rather pedestrian sidewalk construction plan for North Western (see
what I did there) into a much more dynamic placemaking initiative, (3) Ed led
the drive to explicitly ban sexual orientation discrimination from city offices
(see above), (4) Ed seems like a really sharp guy who cares a lot about civic
issues. (5) He cares a lot about public transit. He might be the only city
politician who truly does (although this point does make his opposition to the
streetcar more frustrating). (6) He is a constant devil’s advocate on the
council. This is probably my favorite thing about him. He is the only person to
publicly chastise City Manager Jim Couch for the repeated epic failures in
execution of city projects (see above). He asks tough questions and challenges
assumptions and group think.
So, now that
I have at the onset laid out my counter-arguments, on with my main point, which
boils down to this:
OKLAHOMA CITY HAS A WEAK MAYOR”S OFFICE
Oklahoma City has a
weak Mayors office with very little real power. The mayor is little more than a
glorified city councilor. Whoever is elected mayor will have one vote on the
council. Day-to-day decisions are made by the City Manager, Jim Couch, who
serves at the pleasure of the council. The only additional power that a mayor
has above the council is to nominate citizens to serve on various boards and
committees, and even then these nominees must be voted in by the full council.1
Beyond this nominating power, the Mayor is not much more than an ordinary
city councilor with additional powers as a figurehead or a cheerleader
Mick Cornett’s time as Mayor is a case study in how to use
the soft powers of the office to build coalitions and be a champion for
Oklahoma City.
(1) Mick Cornett has been a strong advocate for walkability, urbanism and physical fitness.
During Mick’s time as mayor walkability has dramatically
increased in Oklahoma City. See his TED talk on the subject here. We have bike lanes now. Not enough, but we have
them. We are building sidewalks, not enough, but we are making a start on
repairing a problem which took 60 years to create. We are beginning the
construction of a streetcar network.
All this is impressive, because well, Cornett is a
Republican. The OKC mayor’s office is non-partisan, but the fact is Cornett is
a Republican. A Republican in Oklahoma. A Republican in a GOP world where being
anti-bicycle and especially anti-rail has become a litmus test almost as
sacrosanct as opposing the Affordable Care Act. The fact that he can get away
with this in and of itself is amazing. The fact that he can get buy-in from the
local powers-that-be is even more astounding. In 2008 the City hired Jeff Speck
(Jeff Speck!) to assess walkability issues in Oklahoma City. A few years Larry
Nichols basically insisted that a TIF district be set up around the Devon Tower
in order to implement Speck’s recommendations. This project came to be known as Project 180.
The fact that Mick Cornett can be so pro-walkability, so
pro-urbanism, so upfront about the overbuilt, too car-friendly infrastructure
of OKC and not only has not been tarred and feathered but also has achieved
buy-in from the local community is a testament to something about the man. His
ability to build coalitions. His personal persuasiveness.
(2) The Thunder.
So much has been written on this that I won’t really wade into it more than I have to. Many many pieces went into moving the Sonics to OKC. Most of these pieces have little to do with Mick Cornett. It cannot be ignored, though, that it was Mick Cornett’s personal lobbying that moved the New Orleans Hornets to OKC for those pivotal post-Katrina years. This was Mick busting his hump, pestering David Stern, working a phone. This is a mayor acting as booster and salesman for his city. Whatever your feelings about professional sports, the Thunder have done so much for the morale of this town. The Thunder, and their successes, have single-handedly erased a huge part of the negativity which always surrounds discussions of Oklahoma City out on the coasts. Maybe that won’t matter to the natives, but to people like me who are struggling with the decision to relocate, it is huge.
Now ask
yourself, can anyone legitimately envision Ed Shadid pulling this off? Honestly,
if Shadid was the mayor in the 90’s we probably wouldn’t even have the
Thunder’s arena, and would instead have been treated to a sober conversation
about the “Downtown Interests” who were trying to get a playground built for
the rich.2
(3) Ed Shadid is a polarizing candidate.
The things that I like about Ed (and there are many) I can keep
liking about him on the council. Seriously I hope he stays on the Council after
losing the Mayor’s race. But his personal divisiveness, his “us against them”
campaign message, will not make for a mayor who can wield the soft power of the
office.
Shadid is running a campaign based, as its central premise,
on resentment by the suburbs against money being spent downtown. This is an old
technique and often an effective one (see Cincinnati). For Oklahoma City this
is sad, in that if effective it destroys the esprit de corps I so much enjoy
about this place. Win or lose, that genie will probably not be going back into
the bottle.
Ed is not a coalition-builder. Yes he inspires passionate
crowds, but he excels much more at inciting populist outrage than in building
coalitions with his colleagues on the horseshoe3.
Shadid is paranoid, always quick to point out the forces
arrayed against him. He lacks a filter and cannot seem to hide his contempt for
his political enemies. For an example of both of these phenomena, see his bizarre rant in the comments section of the Daily Oklahoman in which he attacks Cornett for,
among other things, getting an MBA in his spare time, for planning to take a
seat on the board of Chesapeake Energy (a completely unsubstantiated claim) and
for relying on “Poll-driven chameleon-like
marketing by anonymous big money.”6 Honestly, anyone who uses the
internet ought to know better than to post anything in the comments section of
a newspaper. That is the province for the crank, conspiracy theorist and the
crackpot. For a mainstream candidate to lower himself to this level shows a
remarkable lack of self-control. As for the content of the posting, well, see
above (crank, conspiracy theorist, etc.).
Shadid simply seems to lack the political
skills required to advance a vision for the city. Shadid has made a habit of
swooping into an issue in which he had previously not been engaged, quickly
determining that he knows more than folks who have been working on the issue
for years, and seeks to implement his vision at the expense of others’. It was
a description of this arrogance by a member of the Modern Streetcar
subcommittee which was first to sway me Cornett’s way. Indeed I have
encountered many people who volunteered for Shadid’s 2011 Ward 2 City Council
campaign who have since turned against him.
And since I started this all off by saying
that Mick Cornett is probably an asshole in real life, I will not be too unfair
is making this character judgement: while Ed Shadid honestly seems like a nice
guy, he also strikes me as a man so convinced of his own genius that he is not
particularly interested in the ideas or perception of those he disagrees with.
Not even interested in pretending like he is. In many cases I am convinced that
he is in fact right on the issues. OKC needs better buses, OKC needs better sidewalks,
more minorities ought to be nominated to city committees, etc. But a man so
arrogant in the treatment of those he disagrees with will never win over an
entire city. Mick Cornett—mega church attending, good-old boy backslapping Mick
Cornett--has managed to win over a large swath of the young, urban, progressive
population of Oklahoma City7,8. Can anyone in their wildest dreams
imagine Green Party member, atheist-friendly Shadid winning over both conservatives
in the sprawly OKC hinterlands and moneyed corporate leaders downtown?
(4) Shadid has run a campaign that is
highly disingenuous.
Many of the
MAPS3 initiatives are based exclusively in the suburbs (i.e. sidewalks, trails,
senior wellness centers). A sizeable portion of the money people see being spent
downtown is from TIF districts; the district is funding a lot of its own
momentum. The Shadid campaign makes claims that the City will be on the hook
for a $250 Million conference center hotel, when no plans for such a thing
exist, no proposals have been made to construct or fund one, and previous
public-private partnerships (such as the Skirvin) were both relatively
inexpensive to the taxpayer and also wildly successful4. He makes
frequent mention of the lack of police officers without mentioning that the OKCPD has added as many officers as it is structurally-capable of adding for each of the last two years.
Shadid’s public safety mailers make hay out of the number of abandoned
buildings in OKC without mentioning that the complete Council, Cornett
included, have begun taking steps to address the issue. Shadid campaigns both
as the champion of the suburb and the enemy of sprawl.
A 2011 City
Council campaign in which he believed that “MAPS3 should be completed as it was
promised to voters”5 turned into a
2013 Mayoral campaign based on disassembling it, even if it means revisiting
the 2010 MAPS referendum.
~
So here I am, 18 months into being
an Oklahoma City resident. Being such a newcomer I’m feeling more than a bit
self-conscious about posting this. But I’m going for it anyway, and I’m anxious
to hear what you have to say.
I will close this by saying that I live in Mesta Park, near
downtown Oklahoma City. I like living here. I like being close to things. I
like the feeling of being a part of a city and a part of a community. Cornett
has not been shy about his goal to build a downtown that people, particularly young
people, want to live in. As one of these young people, I appreciate that. Shadid,
on the other hand, has used this to stoke suburban resentment.
But building a nice downtown is not a zero sum game. People
are moving to the city and they are choosing to live within the city, largely
because of increasing amenities. If people didn’t want to live in OKC we wouldn’t
have seen the rise of the Plaza District or the resurrection of Deep Deuce
or Midtown from their vacant-lot purgatories. This is a virtuous cycle which benefits
those in the suburbs with rising tax intakes for the city, more civic pride and
more engagement in the city’s schools. Put another way, every young, involved person
who chooses OKC over Edmond is a win for the entire city.
My first day at work in OKC everyone assumed I lived in
Edmond. Every last person. “Where do you live?” actually meant, “Where in
Edmond do you live?” Devon’s corporate relocation people seemed mystified that
I was looking for a rental in the urban core (and in fact they seemed hesitant
to even drive by the house I found on Craigslist to check it out for me). So
much was the hangover of the 80’s-90’s crappiness of OKC proper that to entire
generations living within the city limits was unimaginable. But here we are.
Footnotes:
1 It appears that voting in a Mayor’s
nominees is du rigueur for the
Council. At least I am unaware of any of Cornett’s hundreds of nominees being
rejected by the council. This fact itself has become a social media
battleground as it pertains to one of Shadid’s talking points about Cornett
overwhelmingly nominating white people to city positions. Cornett supporters
waste no time pointing out that they can find no record of Shadid opposition to
any of these nominees.
2Honestly this point may not be
entirely fair. I have no record of Shadid’s opinion on the construction of the
Chesapeake Arena.
3 ”Horseshoe” being the quaint insider
term for the OKC City Council.
4And were a taxpayer-funded convention
center hotel proposal to be brought to the Council, Shadid could as easily
oppose it there as he could as Mayor. Of course, his ballot measure might
render the whole thing moot.
5And also implied in 2011 that his opponent could not be
trusted to implement the streetcar project http://i.imgur.com/10wScU6.jpg..
6Make no mistake, there are forces arrayed against Shadid. Any
reader of the Oklahoman Editorial page can see this for themselves. But Shadid
has a deeply-ingrained conspiratorial worldview (completely in line with other
Green Party members that I have encountered) which is out of proportion to
reality and indeed a little sad.
7Of course this population is also Shadid’s base. For an
interesting perspective on the irony of young people both enjoying the fruits
of the OKC renaissance and siding with Shadid against the primary face of this
renaissance, see http://www.capitalcityok.com/2014/02/is-cornett-the-right-mayor-of-citys-20-somethings/
8Cornett has also won the support of Wayne Coyne, which is kind
of bizzarro in itself. But come to think of it Flaming Lips LPs are always like
$5-$10 more expensive than they seem like they should be. Does this make Wayne
Coyne one of Shadid’s reviled “Corporate Interests”?